![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

|
|
While this venture type has medium to high ratings in all categories, and as such is well balanced, there is room for improvement in each area. Figure 17: "B/K" Diagram Figure 18: Target "Bulls-eye" Diagram ADVICE: CASE STUDY EXAMPLE: 'Value Plus Heating & Air Conditioning' -- A High Potential Venture BACKGROUND Shortly afterward in Ohio State Bankruptcy Court, Prime Ventilation was poised for dissolution, when David Sonne and a team of five lower-level Prime managers rushed in with a last minute proposal. They presented a business plan to the court judge for a new HVAC company. The company was to be called Value Plus. It would be a new and improved HVAC firm – one with equal ownership, profit sharing, and continuing education. It was a refined model, born out of experience, and advanced by a group of diehard employees who saw great potential in the existing company. Sonne and his team knew the HVAC industry well and saw a long-term need for the installation, replacement, maintenance, and update of HVAC equipment. The group proposed many interesting changes, and they were determined to show the bankruptcy court that they had the skills and capabilities to make their idea work. The old organization was highly structured, inefficient, and plagued by union hold-ups and poor decision-making. The new company on the other hand, was designed to overcome these drawbacks: better management, more effective decision-making, no company union, and a flexible, cost-efficient, team- and-incentive-based work approach would make Value Plus a driving force in the HVAC industry. With Detsneb's help in presenting the new venture, Sonne and his team were granted a second chance to create a better, more competitive HVAC company. The six new partners agreed to mortgage their homes to pay off the Prime creditors. The new venture, under the name of Value Plus Heating & Air Conditioning, became a legal entity, with the six team members retaining equal ownership. All experience requirements for insurance were carried over from the previous company, and 'key-man' insurance was purchased to protect each of the newly-leveraged partners and their families from misfortune. Lower costs, greater overall efficiency, greater control, and a highly skilled, competent, and non-unionized workforce gave Value Plus a competitive edge. The company became an immediate success, winning its very first bid for a lucrative $280,000 contract in Ohio. Since costs for the project were only $40,000, Value Plus had banked almost a quarter million before any work had even begun. Today, the company has doubled in size and, aside from one of the partners selling out, has remained extremely healthy. THE CONCEPT With the decision-making/planning issue resolved, the new managing team sought to reorganize the work specificity of the company. They knew exactly how the work teams functioned and understood all of their intricacies and complexities. With a little thought, the managers were able to put together a workforce that could perform significantly better jobs. The assembly and installation processes were modified, and departmental communication was enhanced through cross-functional teams. Moreover, since state government did not enforce unionization in the industry, Value Plus, unlike any other company in the industry, was allowed to function without union interference. In turn, union hold-up problems were minimized. Even though employee wage rates were freed from union intervention, they were set to be highly competitive and flexible. Once the union issue was eliminated, employee remuneration could be made job-specific. An incentive-based profit sharing plan was implemented which effectively lowered production costs. Before bidding on a job, management would gather everyone together to decide on its individual worth. Employees then, would receive hourly rates of pay that were significantly lower than those paid out by a unionized competitor. Greater efficiency of work and lower hourly employee wages substantially reduced production costs. Value
Plus was now in a position to bid low on various contracts while still providing equal value to the customer.
When the job was complete and the profits shared by all members of the company, employees would receive their respective shares of any remaining money based upon hours worked and the nature of the
activity performed. Ultimately, the non-unionized Value Plus employees would earn more money than their
unionized counterparts. This incentive in turn reinforced the morale and productivity of the workers, allowing
the company to minimize costs further and distribute even greater profits to all within the company. By
minimizing their bounded rationality through effective planning and decision-making, Value Plus management
was able to fulfill the promise to their stakeholders. They were able to modify the work specificity of their
company and, in turn, make it cut-throat competitive. The end result was an operation significantly different from any other in the HVAC industry. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
©Copyright 1998-2003 Ron K. Mitchell under license to Wayne Brown Institute |